This week the meaning of Emancipation is considered alongside the CL Financial fiasco. It is a painful, but necessary, task. Those of us concerned to commemorate the Emancipation of African people from slavery must have the courage and clarity to reflect on our past, both the distant and the recent. In reflection we can find direction and perhaps, the beginning of a solution.
How, if at all, is the CL Financial fiasco connected with the story of Emancipation? I deliberately use the word ‘story’ since it is clear that there are many versions of this period in our history. I say ‘our history’ because, whatever the race of today’s readers, the Emancipation journey is of vital concern to the progress of humanity.
There were notable and honourable African leaders who put up strong resistance to the efforts by Europeans to enslave their people. But the sad and inescapable fact is that there were others who thought of the process differently. It is a painful matter to discuss, but the fact is that some African rulers collaborated with the European slave-traders to capture and sell their people. Not all, but enough to make the difference. Without getting into the entire history, which is way beyond the scope of this column, the actions of that group of rulers were enough to ensure the success of the entire monstrous project. The Atlantic slave-trade shaped large elements of today’s world and we have been trying to build a new one ever since. Yes, an immoral and greedy group of rulers put a greater value on their personal enrichment than the well-being of those they were entrusted to lead.
The entire society paid the price for the selfish ambitions of these rulers.
One of the most striking things about the CL Financial fiasco is that Lawrence Duprey is one of us, an indigenous Caribbean man. Yes, a black man, with African blood flowing through his veins and that is something that has not formed part of our public discussion so far. One of the strangest features of these times is how, despite the over-supply of media, critical issues are not discussed. When one considers that the vast majority of the population of the region comes from an African background, it is striking that Lawrence Duprey is the only such tycoon in the region with his level of profile. But wait, I almost forgot that there is another one. Yes, I am speaking about Michael Lee Chin.
Whichever way you slice it, this is extremely telling and as a result Duprey carried a peculiar set of expectations. Because of his unique profile as a black man, the fact is that Lawrence Duprey was the recipient of widespread admiration, envy and wonder. That is our society and that is one of the ways we deal with its ugly realities.
To go further, the leading people in the CL Financial team were also black. Yes, most of the CL Financial team have African blood flowing in their veins. Yes, by now I can hear some readers saying things like – ‘But X or Y doesn’t think that they are Black’ or ‘So what?’ or ‘Exactly what is your point?’. That kind of skepticism is expected when one discusses this kind of issue. In fact it is my view that the underlying attitude is the very problem.
At the same time, let us note that the regulators are themselves black people. Yes, the picture I am painting is that the main players are virtually all black people – the Cabinet, the Central Bank and the CL Financial/CLICO chiefs.
We African people have come from far, both metaphorically and physically. We now find ourselves in a sorry place with this CL Financial fiasco. We have a particular responsibility to do better this time around. There is no escaping that fact.
CLICO was built around the ideal, by its founder Cyril Duprey (Lawrence’s cousin) that ‘Give a man service, give a man value and he will give you more business’. Simple, but strong, those were the foundation stones of CLICO. Truth prevailed and with hard work the company prospered. CLICO developed unprecedented levels of investor confidence, as a black company (indigenous) in which one could have faith. Given our history as African people, that level of investor confidence is no small or incidental thing. It could only have been the result of solid vision and diligent long-term application, to name just two of the qualities of the founder.
CL Financial was established as a holding company and rapid diversification followed, with investments in a number of areas unrelated to conventional insurance business. As a result of its success, CLICO was able to provide most of the cash to pay for the group’s unorthodox expansion.
At that stage, the activities of the group shifted to reflect the new ambitions of its new chiefs, most notably its Executive Chairman, Lawrence Duprey. Those activities ultimately undermined the stability and health of the whole.
The Emancipation story has many lessons, but the central one, from my point of view, is that many of our rulers lost sight of the balance between private wealth/privilege and the public good. Are we doing better now? For us, in this Emancipation week, it is useful to consider the extent to which we have learnt from our past.
The actual behaviour of the CL Financial chiefs and the group’s shareholders in this moment is instructive. At every turn, the public good has been shafted in favour of private wealth. From the payment of dividends while CLICO’s Statutory Fund was in deficit to the payment of dividends to CL Financial shareholders after they wrote for urgent financial assistance from the State. The pledging of assets which had already been pledged and the attempted sale of assets contrary to the original MoU. The shocking statement of CLICO’s new boss that $5.0Bn was missing from its Statutory Fund and the utter silence subsequently as to its whereabouts.
All this shocking behaviour and no sign of any reprimand, charge or censure from our rulers. Instead, we are told that our entire Treasury has been pledged to assist savers and restore shareholder value. Trinidad & Tobago is a land of many firsts, but this is a tragic one.
How did we get to the point of pledging our common wealth to restoring value to a few privileged people who are showing no proper regard for the public good?
Do we have the moral fibre to recognize what has gone wrong in our past and behave differently?
6 thoughts on “Emancipation”
Truly the pen is mightier than the sword…but so few people use it. I am no business genius but any regular person can see what is going on. Imagine a government bailing out a glorified pyramid scheme. Taking money from the lower ranks to make investments in hopes of paying dividends to those in higher ranks…but then again dividends were paid to everyone so maybe it’s just a regular scam. I suppose “pyramid” would describe how the people building this empire ( CLF is an empire) view society. They are at the top and use everyone else to keep themselves there. The thing thse people forget is that the top weathers the most! I think time has passed and now the top is can be made a base again. “This is the Lord’s doing and it is marvellous in our eyes!” ( for the church folk)
And finally we remember that great is the PNM and it shall prevail. My new slogan is great is the PNM and it has utterly failed (not that I have personal problems with any of its many esteemed members). I coined this one first so that slogan is copyrighted 🙂
Many thanks Afra
Hmmmnn…a blog post that deviates somewhat from your norm, I’m intrigued.
This post although another bold and brave historical comparison, is somewhat scarce of the usual cold, hard facts and figures and typical systematic/chronological presentation of same. Quite vague yet telling, so given the trend of the author this must be the start of a series. “How did we get to the point of pledging our common wealth to restoring value to a few privileged people who are showing no proper regard for the public good?” Really? When were we ever not at this point? Will this exploration be the content of your series? Do you dare?
A real (i.e. unbiased/not politically motivated) and thorough comparative analysis of; the performance of our previous regimes and the wealth available to them vs. real socio-economic change during their tenure, the real impact of the fall of previously perceived black role models and tycoons vs. the continued rise of the seemingly more fortunate/privileged few or “noble” capitalists of other ethnic origins and/or persuasions is definitely long overdue and will no doubt reveal the real “shackles” that led to slavery and remain post emancipation – not just in T&T but globally.
A real comparative analysis of the above raises quite a hornets nest indeed or rather given our history more Pandora’s box.
Given the role you’ve adopted as steward of our public purse, such analysis inevitably takes you way beyond the CL Financial bailout and Invader’s Bay fiasco. So again, do you dare? “Do we have the moral fibre to recognize what has gone wrong in our past and behave differently?”
Keen to see where you go from this blog brave one. Very keen.
I’ve just noticed that your emancipation day facebook post on July 31st 2014 was actually a repost of a 2009 blog post which I’ve just replied to above. So even more intrigued. Please read my response, care to go down that path with a series of articles or too off topic given your present CL, Invader’s Bay and Procurement Bill focus?